4 ms·

And so is all Github-dependent deployment...

• diegorbaquero 11y ago
  Got here because of that haha, can't deploy. EDIT: Why downvote fellas?
  • kuschku 11y ago
    Downvotes are most likely because – if you are already using git – you should just be able to switch over to a local repo?
    • Sir_Substance 11y ago
      Depends how his deployment pipeline is plumbed in. If he's dependent on Travis for builds (for example), he can't just switch.
      • kuschku 11y ago
        Depending on services from others for your own business without having a SLA is just a disaster waiting to happen. Along the lines of "two is one, one is none", anything that you don’t own or where you don’t have a SLA has to be considered not existing for a business.
        • TeMPOraL 11y ago
          "Move fast and break things." Including your own bones. People are getting too spoiled by perceived reliability. Internet is not electricity yet. And especially third-party services on the Internet.
        • Sir_Substance 11y ago
          Totally agree.
  • dtech 11y ago
    Because your comment adds nothing.
    • random55643 11y ago
      It adds something. It shows an example of an actual person affected by this. Yours here, however, I'm not sure what that adds :)
      • TeMPOraL 11y ago
        It shows an example of someone who caught the "why downvotes?" bait, and enables a comment like yours. INB4: my comment shows an example of someone going meta.
      • dtech 11y ago
        Someone was apparently confused as to why his comment was downvoted. I answered that question.
• zuppy 11y ago
  We're using satis to create a mirror with all the required composer packages and we're deploying from there. https://github.com/composer/satis https://github.com/composer/satis The main reason that we switch to that was exactly to avoid deployment issues. Security is also a bonus (in case somebody modifies existing packages). Probably there are tools like this for all type of packages.