5 ms·
I agree strongly. But Boston as well as Manhattan is denser than SF (from what I've heard of SF); in answer to teacup50's question, I'd say "first develop to Bo
by clock_tower 11y ago
I agree strongly. But Boston as well as Manhattan is denser than SF (from what I've heard of SF); in answer to teacup50's question, I'd say "first develop to Boston levels, which are clearly still humane and habitable, then revisit the density issue after that."
- teacup50 11y agoBoston's average population density is 13.3k/sq mi. San Francisco's average population density is 18.5k/sq mi. SF has been developed beyond Boston levels, and it's still not enough.