6 ms·
The license says to "keep intact" all copyright notices. My layman's assumption would be that means scrubbing is a violation. It also says a lot of words that s
by geoelectric 11y ago
The license says to "keep intact" all copyright notices. My layman's assumption would be that means scrubbing is a violation. It also says a lot of words that seem to come down to "if you put your copyright notice in, then their attribution has to be at least as prominent."
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode -- section 4(b)
All said, though, it's sketchy practice no matter what the license says literally. A main purpose of CC is to give you a license that can be followed common-sensibly. Playing "lawyer' with the wording isn't reciprocating the goodwill of the author.
- coldtea 11y agoIf the author also sells his license for "no attribution" then maybe he's not exactly playing by the CC ideals either...
- geoelectric 11y agoI disagree--dual-licensing is absolutely a thing, as is white-labeling. The author is putting a price on hiding his involvement. Why is that not a valid thing to do?