4 ms·
Interesting, that seems to contradict the information in http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/performance-xeon-e5-v3-advance
by tveita 11y ago
Interesting, that seems to contradict the information in http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/performance-xeon-e5-v3-advanced-vector-extensions-paper.pdf http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/...
Specifically, the FAQ says:
"Will running a small number of Intel AVX instructions
reduce frequency below the regular marked frequency?
No, frequency will be reduced below the regular marked frequency only if a real power
or thermal constraint is reached, not just due to the presence of Intel AVX instructions.
Some workloads that utilize Intel AVX instructions could still achieve turbo above the
marked TDP frequency."
- semi-extrinsic 11y agoNo, you're actually agreeing: GP says "it reduces how much a CPU can turbo", while you are pointing out "it will not reduce frequency below the regular marked frequency". Say marked freq is 3.4 and the CPU turbos to 3.9. GP is saying an AVX2 instruction will drop it from 3.9 to 3.7 or 3.5, while you're saying it won't drop it below 3.4.