3 ms·
Let's not lose track of what started the conversation. It was somebody saying "the median family spends nowhere near that on a car". That's what we're discus
by knodi123 11y ago
Let's not lose track of what started the conversation.
It was somebody saying "the median family spends nowhere near that on a car".
That's what we're discussing. That the amount people pay for a car, is less than what people pay for a new car. That's the only point I leapt in to defend, and if you're arguing with me against other points, then you're talking to the wrong guy.
Look- the average number of arms for a tennis player is less than 2. Similarly, some (perhaps most) people spend their car-acquiring dollars on used cars. So, the average amount people spend on a car is less than the average sale price of a new car. QED, end of discussion.
Now, you want to argue that among people who buy a new car, $35k is acceptably average? Okay, fine, whatever, I don't care, and neither does anybody else in this thread.
- osweiller 11y agoNow, you want to argue that among people who buy a new car, This conversation is specifically and only about new cars, in this case the Tesla Model 3. It is outrageous that you're implying that I'm the one diverting the conversation, when the very root post by dionidium was a completely irrelevant non-sequitur as they injected some completely irrelevant sociology bias into the conversation. If we were discussing the average price of a fast food meal, would a comment about a Cup O' Noodles have any relevance? No one cares to argue what people pay for used cars, or for no car at all, because that is irrelevant to this discussion.
- knodi123 11y ago> This conversation is specifically and only about new cars I understand that's certainly how you've been behaving. Despite several people trying to disabuse you of that notion.