6 ms·
The producers of content that I view not being financially secure is a problem. I've read a lot of useful stuff over the years, and I really want the people who
by stegosaurus 11y ago
The producers of content that I view not being financially secure is a problem. I've read a lot of useful stuff over the years, and I really want the people who made that possible to thrive.
I don't particularly care about whether they can buy flash cars, but I do care about them being able to live without stress and continue to do the things they love and are best at.
As far as I'm concerned, the problem looks like this:
1. Society isn't providing them with a way to live, so it's down to me (and others like me) to help out.
Which leads to:
2. I'm not wealthy enough to feel like I can give back to them, or there's no reasonable interface to do so
Which leads to:
3. Out of desperation, they try to force my hand by employing advertising (so that indirectly there's a cashflow).
I'd rather work on #1 and #2 directly than look at #3. I'm not that interested in short term solutions, and advertising is a particularly ugly one.
- stegosaurus 11y agoTo put it another way: I'm not sure that the creation and dissemination of knowledge works well as a capitalistic business. I'm not sure that it leads to optimal outcomes WRT the dissemination of said material. I don't know how we deal with the edge case of trading scarce resources like food and land for unlimited resources like data, but I don't think advertising is it. When you think about it, it's really quite odd. The deal is that you can view this web page, if in the abstract you commit to buying some portion of a physical item or service from someone else later on. To me, it feels a lot like an inefficient form of tax.