3 ms·
Related is Tesla's recycling program of batteries: https://www.teslamotors.com/nl_NL/blog/teslas-closed-loop-battery-recycling-program https://www.teslamotors.c
by huuu 11y ago
Related is Tesla's recycling program of batteries: https://www.teslamotors.com/nl_NL/blog/teslas-closed-loop-battery-recycling-program https://www.teslamotors.com/nl_NL/blog/teslas-closed-loop-ba...
Some people are skeptical about electric cars because the estimate life span of a battery is around eight years.
But reading the article above (and others) you can see the batteries are not an issue anymore.
I was also a little skeptical about electric cars but I think the absolute pros are:
* Electricity can come from any source (coal, nuclear, sun, water, waste, aliens).
* No emission (in cities).
* No noise pollution.
But I still got one issue with a lot of those environment friendly solutions.
Because why would you use a lot of energy for sensors, insane mode, automatic doors, displays, computers, and so on?
I know you need some of them but in the end environment friendly means: using less energy (in any form).
- Yaggo 11y ago> Because why would you use a lot of energy for sensors, insane mode, automatic doors, displays, computers, and so on? Signals electronics (displays, sensors, etc) use so little energy compared to power electronics (the drivetrain system) that it doesn't really matter.
- huuu 11y agoIt does matter. 1 W * 1,000,000 cars is still 1 MW. It's like saying a javascript file of 1MB is ok because there are images of 10MB on the same page.
- ricardobeat 11y agoNo, it's like saying everyone should cut down their JavaScript files by 1kb to reduce emissions.
- mikeash 11y agoIt's more like saying that if you somehow turned off all the fancy electronics, you'd add maybe half a mile to the car's 200+ mile range.
- chillacy 11y agoAn entry level model S has a ~360hp engine, so 0.2 MW A million of those cars is 200,000 MW Amdahl's law: when optimizing performance, target the largest consumer first. And in this case the engine is the largest, by at least 5 orders of magnitude It would save much more electricity educating people to drive less aggressively and use less braking than to remove the sensors
- jsli 11y ago> but in the end environment friendly means: using less energy (in any form). Is it? I thought it meant no harm to the environment. If the charging station is powered by solar energy, I don't see how using the otherwise wasted energy wrong.
- huuu 11y agoWe also thought that using oil wouldn't harm the world. It's all about scale. Of course some solar panels are not going to harm the world. But what if we need, lets say, 1% of the earth covered with solar panels? If it's hard to predict the effects it might be dangerous.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- glaberficken 11y ago>No noise pollution. EVs will still generate a fair amount of noise pollution. There will be important improvements for city quality of life, mostly in reductions in the sub 35kmh acceleration/deceleration moments. But for highway speeds the reductions will not be that big. Check this interesting wikipedia article for reference. Linking to the part that lists the basic variables that affect Roadway Noise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadway_noise#Description_of_basic_variables https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadway_noise#Description_of_b...