The article mentions the Iceland info and characterizes it as a "token" revelation meant exactly to keep people obfuscated and arguing about whether the leak di

The article mentions the Iceland info and characterizes it as a "token" revelation meant exactly to keep people obfuscated and arguing about whether the leak did or did not implicate wealthy Western elites. I agree with the article. The leaks about Iceland and South America clearly do not count as major investigative reporting on western involvement. When U.S. officials, celebrities, and financiers start getting named, since there is literally no doubt they have been involved in this in illegal ways, then I'll believe they aren't holding back to protect Western interests. Until then, the article is absolutely on point with its criticism.