Wait, they opted to keep the Yarvin guy in the conference?! This post says readers are "undoubtedly" aware of the decision De Goes made, but I was not (though

Wait, they opted to keep the Yarvin guy in the conference?! This post says readers are "undoubtedly" aware of the decision De Goes made, but I was not (though I was aware of the controversy itself). I read De Goes's blog post about the decision just now, but it's so mush mouthed I still can't tell if they opted to keep him. If so, wow. The only thing I don't really agree with here is talking about this in terms of labor. I mean, just imagine if they decided to only send the questionnaire to white men, to avoid visiting this labor upon minorities and women. Usually this logic goes something like: since minorities and women have already suffered oppression and discrimination, they should not also be responsible for arguing against or affecting change against that oppression/discrimination. But if white people and men were going to just do the right thing on their own, then we wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. I like Fredrik DeBoer on this particular point, he talks about it in this post: http://fredrikdeboer.com/2014/12/26/race-science-and-shoulds/ http://fredrikdeboer.com/2014/12/26/race-science-and-shoulds...