4 ms·
In your above calculation, you're assuming that an object needs to be resolved to be visible. To the contrary, telescopes are able to see un-resolved objects (o
by tomr_stargazer 11y ago
In your above calculation, you're assuming that an object needs to be resolved to be visible. To the contrary, telescopes are able to see un-resolved objects (objects whose angular size is below the angular resolution of the telescope) all the time -- they are called "stars". The relevant parameter here isn't angular size, but flux[0] (brightness).
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_flux https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_flux
- dietrichepp 11y agoYou're absolutely right, I realized that right after I posted that.