4 ms·
Arch isn't a distro for people who take issue to reading up on what they're actually doing to their system with upgrades, package installations, and configurati
by ferrari8608 11y ago
Arch isn't a distro for people who take issue to reading up on what they're actually doing to their system with upgrades, package installations, and configuration. That's why they have one of the most amazing wikis around. It's expected that you read all of the things.
I still don't agree with the unbootable bit though. That hasn't happened on any of my systems (two Arch machines, two Arch-based Antergos machines) in over a year without it being my own fault tinkering with something. I don't know man, maybe we're running completely different hardware or something.
- tinco 11y agoPlease note that I ran Arch for over 5 years, upgrading perhaps once or twice a year. Rebooting only at power failures, and at particularly bad security issues. The hardware was a Pentium 4. This was years ago (when I was in college).
- seba_dos1 11y agoThat's basically guaranteed to break your system on Arch. Don't do that - it's your fault when it breaks like that.