5 ms·
All very good reasons why we should be throwing more police officers as well as the executives and owners of Harris in jail for using these things. It's impossi
by gnu8 11y ago
All very good reasons why we should be throwing more police officers as well as the executives and owners of Harris in jail for using these things. It's impossible to manufacture or operate a stingray without breaking the law.
- evilsocket 11y agonever heard about faraday cages?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- woodman 11y ago... now we just need to figure out how to lure the surveillance target into our EM-shielded cage.
- evilsocket 11y agomy point is that it's quite easy to "play" with such things without actually breaking the law
- Semiapies 11y agoThey aren't "playing".
- walrus 11y agoI think you may have misunderstood the comment. In the US, Ireland, and probably elsewhere, police are using rogue cell sites ("Stingrays") for surveillance. The person you replied to is claiming that this is illegal, and the police forces that are doing it should be punished. They weren't talking about people experimenting with setting up Faraday-caged toy cell sites in their basement — there's absolutely nothing wrong with that and it should be encouraged!
- maxerickson 11y agothe executives and owners of Harris in jail They were also talking about the people that built the devices.
- industriousthou 11y agoDid you intend to reply to the grandparent comment?
- fabulist 11y agoI would counter that we need to make it more difficult for police to use Stingrays, but law enforcement should absolutely engage in all sorts of man-in-the-middle attacks when it is in the public interest. The problem is not that the have a particular capability, but that they have such an overabundance of them and that they deploy them far too readily.