4 ms·
As a Linux user, most other engines, including CryEngine, have nothing to offer me. Unreal was also the first "free" open source release of that class of engine
by krisdol 11y ago
As a Linux user, most other engines, including CryEngine, have nothing to offer me. Unreal was also the first "free" open source release of that class of engine.
- coldtea 11y agoWell, it's not Linux is the primary target for commercial game engines (Unreal included) in the first place. Desktop Linux is a tiny niche (measured to below 2%), and Linux gaming even smaller part of that. Heck, even OS X which got around 10% doesn't get much love, gaming wise...
- mixedCase 11y ago>Desktop Linux is a tiny niche (measured to below 2%), Not for developers. And both Unreal and Unity have Linux editors and support compiling for Linux.
- coldtea 11y agoNot for web/server/backend developers, but YES for game developers.
- jaegerpicker 11y agoNo for game developers. A lot of big studios sure but A LOT of indie devs and mobile game devs are mostly developing in Linux or mostly Mac OS X because if you are a mobile dev you have to support iOS. The game dev world is a lot larger than the latest AAA game.
- coldtea 11y ago>The game dev world is a lot larger than the latest AAA game. Yes. But while the iOS casual game dev world is in the millions, the Linux game world is still small.
- krisdol 11y agoThat's why CryEngine is not making news by following in some limited footsteps of Unreal. Unreal's focus on linux is news, as was its initial open sourcing and drastic price drop. Plus, it has a very long, old history that many folks of all ages here are already familiar with.