Clearly, it hadn't been stolen -- but had it been reported stolen? It's a classic method of keeping something you're supposed to return. In that case, their a

Clearly, it hadn't been stolen -- but had it been reported stolen? It's a classic method of keeping something you're supposed to return. In that case, their activating the webcam would be perfectly in line with the stated policy. Point being, there's still a lot of information we don't yet have. The policy of remotely monitoring the webcams is stupid, but beyond that, we don't know the specifics of why this particular webcam was activated or what the "improper behavior" was, so we don't know how much additional stupid there might be.