4 ms·
As a Manhattan resident, the problem you describe isn't really the one being addressed by de blasio's plan. "Billionaires row" in midtown was already expensive
by mattzito 11y ago
As a Manhattan resident, the problem you describe isn't really the one being addressed by de blasio's plan.
"Billionaires row" in midtown was already expensive real estate beforehand in a very desirable neighborhood, it just got converted into giant wealth safety deposit boxes.
The Williamsburg example from the article is more of the core problem being addressed - how do we allow a neighborhood that was not so desirable to be redeveloped without blowing it to bits.
I do also believe we should tax non-primary residence apartments for the reasons you describe, but it's a separate problem.
- sokoloff 11y ago[Differentially] Taxing non-resident housing encourages buying first houses on the margin, but also hurts renters (as the tax is passed through in the rental economics). I'm not saying it's all bad, but it's sure not all good either...
- eru 11y agoThat's why you tax land, not houses. Land value taxes can't be passed through.