4 ms·
I'm rejecting how you are classifying the problem. Cornering off a specific subsection of the population and saying its too small to worry about is deflection.
by reddytowns 11y ago
I'm rejecting how you are classifying the problem. Cornering off a specific subsection of the population and saying its too small to worry about is deflection.
Everyone can be classified and cornered off in some way. Does that mean that we should consider everyone's contribution to the problem irrelevant, or just those with a simple and easy to convey label?
- melling 11y agoHow about we grill those people with leaf blowers and lawn mowers? http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/emissions-test-car-vs-truck-vs-leaf-blower.html http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/emissions-test-c... http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98532&page=1 http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98532&page=1 Those little engines are particularly bad.
- Retra 11y agoYou're worried about a slippery slope that doesn't exist. If I said "let π = 3.1415" would you be objecting that I might as well set π = 3, just because I'm not using its exact value? Are you really arguing that we can't afford to overlook any pollution? You don't solve problems by rejecting any solution that isn't absolutely perfect.
- reddytowns 11y agoI didn't see any solution being proposed here...