3 ms·
The above comment was made by a brand new a account and follows a trend of other fishy comments. I think that if you have no evidence to substantiate these acc
by mattwdelong 17y ago
The above comment was made by a brand new a account and follows a trend of other fishy comments.
I think that if you have no evidence to substantiate these accusations, then you should keep them to yourself.
I mean, he can easily just be one of the many happy frequent visitors of Mixergy? Andrew does post links to here quite often from the Mixergy site, and they can easily just follow that link.
Though, I must admit as a guy who loves the Mixergy interviews, who is currently saving up for his own startup; I am currently forgoing a cell phone, car, insurance and any other unnecessary expenses, and I cannot validate a $25-100/mo charge for this content. Its valuable, but not that valuable to me. I think he forgot about his bootstrapped followers who can't watch his interviews live and often catch them after the fact.
Though in hindsight, this just may increase the viewership of his live shows - which is an increase in viewer participation in the interview process. Perhaps that is his goal?
- AndrewWarner 17y agoThanks. It's not about the live shows so much as it is about getting people to watch my interviews the day or week that post them. What I'm finding is that if I don't create urgency around watching the interviews the day I watch them, people will consider them old and ignore them.
- swombat 17y agoThat makes a lot of sense. But if that's your objective, I'd argue for making it $10 or even $5 a month rather than $25. At $25 you'll cut out a LOT of people who would be ideal viewers for these interviews.