4 ms·

I think this is a strawman - I don't think anyone is suggesting publishing WIP commits.

• serge2k 11y ago
  Sure they are, if you don't YOU'RE A LIAR!
• brianpan 11y ago
  Isn't that exactly what the original commenter is suggesting? > no rebases, no squashes, sometimes not even fast-forwards
  • ris 11y ago
    I think the implication is rebases or squashes of already published work.
    • WorldMaker 11y ago
      Thanks, that was indeed the primary implication. That said, I've been happy to debate the larger implications that there are UI/UX tweaks/story-telling that could make even the work-in-progress non yet published stuff more appealing to publish without needed to mutate it from its as-developed states... But yes, I was mostly speaking to published commits.