3 ms·
I'm not seeing much of a win here over emacs's py-shell.
by Estragon 17y ago
I'm not seeing much of a win here over emacs's py-shell.
- alrex021 17y agoThis one doesn't come with an Emacs 10 year learning curve prerequisite. ;-)
- Estragon 17y agoOh come now. It's at most two years. :-)
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- nuclear_eclipse 17y agoor an Emacs prereq, for us Vim users...
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- samdk 17y agoIs there anything like this that integrates well with Vim? Or should I get hacking?
- xtho 17y agoSince you can include a python interpreter in vim, building some sort of REPL should be rather trivial.
- rquirk 17y agohttp://code.google.com/p/conque/ http://code.google.com/p/conque/ From the site: Conque is a Vim plugin allowing users to execute and interact with programs, typically a shell such as bash, inside a buffer window.
- akkartik 17y agoI also recently discovered this awesome plugin that uses screen for the heavy lifting: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2711 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2711
- abentspoon 17y agoI posted this last week: http://m5.posterous.com/slime-like-communication-from-vim-to-ipython http://m5.posterous.com/slime-like-communication-from-vim-to... It lets you open a vim session from ipython, and send lines, selections, or the whole file back to the shell. If you'd like to do some hacking, it doesn't seem to be able to send single function definitions yet.
- artagnon 17y agoYeah, ipython.el improves upon python-mode. I'd really like to see if it can be enhanced further using DreamPie.