13 ms·
Good point. The interviewees had an understanding that this content will be freely available and now that's changed. Then again, maybe he told them the content
by heliodorj 17y ago
Good point. The interviewees had an understanding that this content will be freely available and now that's changed. Then again, maybe he told them the content will be free but there is a possibility that one day it will not be free anymore. Either way, the better approach would have been to leave existing interviews freely available and start applying the pricing structure from the present onward.
On another note, I'm glad to see Andrew turning Mixergy into a real business that can be self-sustaining. As entrepreneurs, we should all be able to agree with that.
- grumpyfart 17y agoI hope this won't sound wrong, this is mixergy's about page: ...I used credit cards and ingenuity to create a $30+ mil / year (in sales) internet business... Sorry but after creating a $30+ mil annual sale company trying to sell videos for 25$ to max. 1000 people in a lifetime is not a great step forward for an entrepreneur. Maybe he has a grand master plan to make more 30+$ mils with mixergy ....
- melvinram 17y agoNot sure what his plans are but hey, at least it'll be profitable... which is more than a lot of enterpreneurs can claim.