3 ms·
Right, that's by definition what a "developer license" means; realize that this may not be common knownledge, but comment reads to me as if this was some form o
by nxzero 11y ago
Right, that's by definition what a "developer license" means; realize that this may not be common knownledge, but comment reads to me as if this was some form of trickery, which it clearly is not.
- vollmond 11y agoThough I am surprised to see "test" not included in the dev license. Aren't they usually lumped together?
- mkj 11y agoMaybe they are worried about perpetual beta sites.
- jdmichal 11y agoIf it's externally accessible to customers, it's production. Whether you call your served content beta is irrelevant.
- pionar 11y agoIt doesn't mention test at all in the agreement, I don't know what OP's talking about. It only forbids production installations.
- CraigJPerry 11y agoIn my experience, I've always got the dev / test env licences for free anyway when paying for prod / dr. It's a checkbox in some companies procurement method, in the same way many require source code escrow just to do business.
- dpeterson 11y agoPretty sure it means you can't have servers running your tests that prepare your production code for deployment. Maybe you use RHEL to run Openshift 3 with containers spinning up a test environment to run acceptance tests exactly like production before deploying the same containers on the production machines. Not allowed with the free dev license.