4 ms·
It's not. This has been reported previously on dates other than April 1st.
by TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago
It's not. This has been reported previously on dates other than April 1st.
- acqq 11y agoWas the "ban" reported or the fact that "it was on 1st of April" won't protect the Chinese from the law against knowingly spreading false information?
- TazeTSchnitzel 11y agoThe former. It's not just April 1st, the PRC isn't too fond of satire.
- acqq 11y ago> The former. You mean the later I guess (just the law against the misinformation, not just on 1st of April)?