So the claims as you specify them are those of Barry Brill not the IPCC: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Brill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Brill "

So the claims as you specify them are those of Barry Brill not the IPCC: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Brill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Brill "New Zealand politician and a lawyer." "He was also involved with the New Zealand Climate Science Education Trust, a charitable organisation that, according to the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), appears to have been set up solely to take court action against them. The trust lost two court cases against NIWA and on both occasions, was ordered to pay costs. NIWA has put the trust into liquidation and as of 2014 was considering to pursue Brill and another trustee for the owed money.[7]" His claims are, of course, a distortion of what really happened, and are based on what he and those like him call the "hiatus." Which is also misinterpretation of the curve of the temperature change, and which those especially liked before the last two years that broke most of the records. I see only the agenda there, and again, scientific illiteracy.