I'm discussing the photographs that are in the linked article. Am I supposed to not see the juxtaposition between a complaint about the global warming effects

I'm discussing the photographs that are in the linked article. Am I supposed to not see the juxtaposition between a complaint about the global warming effects of a methane release, and the guy who is depicted in front of his Rolls Royce, in front of his 3-car garage, on one of the many culs-de-sac in the space filling graph of an unwalkable carscape? Am I supposed to feel like Charles Chow gives one flying handshake about global warming? Part of me feels like the Times is doing a subtle, sly job here, and part of me feels like they missed the whole story.