4 ms·
Note the pattern: Another attempt to trap a Clinton in a situation where it's illegal to lie (Bill to a Grand Jury, Hillary to an FBI officer). Bill, way back
by hackuser 11y ago
Note the pattern: Another attempt to trap a Clinton in a situation where it's illegal to lie (Bill to a Grand Jury, Hillary to an FBI officer).
Bill, way back in the 1990s before the testimony that caused all the problems, said that their only goal was to ask him damaging things under oath and then leak his responses or prosecute him for perjury. Remember that Bill was not testifying in a case about Lewinksy, but in an unrelated case regarding Paula Jones. But once he was under oath they just used it as a fishing expedition to achieve political ends.
Is this how we want our democracy to work? Probably law enforcement can find something to justify prosecuting or at least investigating anyone.
-----
EDIT: It turns out FBI Director Comey has a history investigating the Clintons:
Comey’s first brush with them came when Bill Clinton was president. Looking to get back into government after a stint in private practice, Comey signed on as deputy special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee. In 1996, after months of work, Comey came to some damning conclusions: Hillary Clinton was personally involved in mishandling documents and had ordered others to block investigators as they pursued their case. Worse, her behavior fit into a pattern of concealment: she and her husband had tried to hide their roles in two other matters under investigation by law enforcement. Taken together, the interference by White House officials, which included destruction of documents, amounted to “far more than just aggressive lawyering or political naiveté,” Comey and his fellow investigators concluded. It constituted “a highly improper pattern of deliberate misconduct.”
Comey parlayed the Whitewater job into top posts in Virginia and New York, returning to Manhattan in 2002 to be the top federal prosecutor there. One of his first cases as a line attorney in the same office 15 years earlier had been the successful prosecution of Marc Rich, a wealthy international financier, for tax evasion. But on his last day as President in 2001, Bill Clinton pardoned Rich. “I was stunned,” Comey later told Congress. As top U.S. prosecutor in New York in 2002, appointed by George W. Bush, Comey inherited the criminal probe into the Rich pardon and 175 others Clinton had made at the 11th hour.
Despite evidence that several pardon recipients, including Rich, had connections to donations to Bill Clinton’s presidential library and Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate campaign, Comey found no criminal wrongdoing.
http://time.com/4276988/jim-comey-hillary-clinton/ http://time.com/4276988/jim-comey-hillary-clinton/
- Mithaldu 11y agoAre you seriously saying you'd prefer the US president be allowed to lie? If that is not what you're saying, please phrase it clearly and directly, and not by implying.
- hackuser 11y ago> you'd prefer the US president be allowed to lie? Of course I'd prefer a completely trustworthy person as president, but such people don't exist. I think law enforcement can find a reason to investigate anyone, including any candidate or President; once an investigation starts, it can be used as a fishing expedition and lead anywhere, for the reasons I described above. That's a risk to our democracy; law enforcement could have a veto, to a degree, over the American people's choices. By the way, let's tone it down. By your demands, one might think I'm the one being deposed.
- throwaway_xx9 11y agoPoliticians are allowed to lie. Police are allowed to lie. Only the little people are not allowed to lie.
- pjc50 11y agoWell, everyone else is in US politics, so why not?