5 ms·

Couldn't they just update a timestamp? "As of april 3rd 2016, we haven't received an NSL"

• peterwwillis 11y ago
  IANAL, but based on the EFF's page on warrant canaries, it seems like they can, in a way. They can state any legal processes they have not been involved in, for basically any period of time, though EFF recommends several months between any such kind of report. The easiest thing is for them to issue, say, quarterly transparency reports and saying "For this past quarter we have received no XYZ".
  • ChristianBundy 11y ago
    Some services have a daily canary (like https://proxy.sh/canary https://proxy.sh/canary), but we don't know whether they could be forced to sign a new canary even after they've been served an NSL.
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
  • Viper007Bond 11y ago
    https://transparency.automattic.com/national-security/ https://transparency.automattic.com/national-security/
• mtgx 11y ago
  I don't see why not. It would be funnier if they said "Until March 1st and starting with March 3rd we haven't received any NSL."
  • jessaustin 11y ago
    Unfortunately I don't think any judges would laugh...
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]