3 ms·
Is this the first warrant canary that we have a reasonably high degree of certainty was actually tripped? I remember a couple of other warrant canary cases that
by shalmanese 11y ago
Is this the first warrant canary that we have a reasonably high degree of certainty was actually tripped? I remember a couple of other warrant canary cases that could be more parsimoniously attributed to user error but none this clearcut.
Any other warrant canaries trip before?
- ikeboy 11y agohttp://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-omits-warrant-canary-from-latest-transparency-reports-patriot-act-data-demands-likely-made/ http://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-omits-warrant-canary-from...
- jat850 11y agoAccording to Wikipedia, Apple's warrant canary was removed in the July-December 2013 transparency report (and remained absent in the following transparency report in 2014).
- alanfalcon 11y agoThey now report on the number of such requests they receive using a banding system, right? They can say they received between 0-249 such requests this year, something (essentially useless) like that?
- Houshalter 11y agoIf you don't assume compromise when a canary is tripped, then it defeats the entire purpose of a canary. At the very least, someone could ask the site owners about it, and they could deny it. If thu don't respond at all then they definitely have been ordered not to talk about it. Either way you can get the truth with certainty.