There are kinds of corruption and abuse. I believe that he's looking to gauge which kind happened here. For example, if you have past convictions for drug poss

There are kinds of corruption and abuse. I believe that he's looking to gauge which kind happened here. For example, if you have past convictions for drug possession and the corruption in this case was that the officer saw you, knew your history, just assumed you were guilty and refused to back down when he realized that you were clean. Alternately, you were driving along and (From your account name, I'm going to assume that you're brown) he sees a brown guy driving through a "bad area" and decides to make a bust, regardless of your guilt or innocence. Both are misconduct. Both are wrong but I believe that the other poster was just trying to get a mental image.