3 ms·
> It's a sub-pattern of "ain't got time for dat". Disagree on this. It has nothing to do with efficiency in context of unlikely events. As others have noted he
by eternalban 11y ago
> It's a sub-pattern of "ain't got time for dat".
Disagree on this. It has nothing to do with efficiency in context of unlikely events. As others have noted here, it is effectively an assertion of expected language/system/operating-environment properties. Think axioms.
- ctdonath 11y agoNo, I'm primarily thinking of "ain't got time for dat", as in "there's a very real deadline, I have a lot of other things to get done, and this case isn't ever going to happen and I don't have time to prove it to the compiler."