4 ms·

Somewhat disappointing that an article talking about how great of an architect she was didn't actually have any pictures of her architecture, let alone her most

Somewhat disappointing that an article talking about how great of an architect she was didn't actually have any pictures of her architecture, let alone her most popular work, in the article. I mean, it was easy enough to find on google, but it seems rather silly for a major publication to miss that. Her work was quite good though. She is a loss, but thankfully we were lucky enough to have so many contributions from her.

yannk 11y ago
Licencing issues?
- neoCrimeLabs 11y ago
  Doubt it. Here's a large selection of images all licensed CC-BY-SA[1]: * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_by_Zaha_Hadid https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_by_Zah... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CITCO_with_Zaha_Hadid_for_The_Secret_Garden https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CITCO_with_Zaha_... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furniture_by_Zaha_Hadid https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furniture_by_Zah... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wirl_%28Zaha_Hadid%29 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wirl_%28Zaha_Had... And that was from a single 30-second search. Spending 1-2 minutes on an image site would easily return many other images with respectable licensing terms. [1] - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
- xxpor 11y ago
  Copyright in the US doesn't prevent people from taking pictures of architecture. NB: This is not necessarily the case in the EU.
mih 11y ago
Here you go - http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-34340233 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-34340233
neoCrimeLabs 11y ago
UPDATE - Looks like they updated the article to include images of her work. (I'd edit my original comment, but the edit link is gone)
kderbe 11y ago
Here's the link that was added to the article in an update, with photos and summaries of some of her projects: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/01/arts/design/zaha-hadid-designs.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/01/arts/design/za...

yannk 11y ago

Licencing issues?

neoCrimeLabs 11y ago
Doubt it. Here's a large selection of images all licensed CC-BY-SA[1]: * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_by_Zaha_Hadid https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_by_Zah... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CITCO_with_Zaha_Hadid_for_The_Secret_Garden https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CITCO_with_Zaha_... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furniture_by_Zaha_Hadid https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furniture_by_Zah... * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wirl_%28Zaha_Hadid%29 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wirl_%28Zaha_Had... And that was from a single 30-second search. Spending 1-2 minutes on an image site would easily return many other images with respectable licensing terms. [1] - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
xxpor 11y ago
Copyright in the US doesn't prevent people from taking pictures of architecture. NB: This is not necessarily the case in the EU.

mih 11y ago

Here you go - http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-34340233 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-34340233

neoCrimeLabs 11y ago

UPDATE - Looks like they updated the article to include images of her work. (I'd edit my original comment, but the edit link is gone)

kderbe 11y ago

Here's the link that was added to the article in an update, with photos and summaries of some of her projects: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/01/arts/design/zaha-hadid-designs.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/04/01/arts/design/za...