6 ms·

> Take Erdogan as a businessman instead of a political figure The US is strong in the business world because they endure differing opinions! Astute businessme

> Take Erdogan as a businessman instead of a political figure The US is strong in the business world because they endure differing opinions! Astute businessmen can see how limiting free speech limits their own success. Good businessmen do not surround themselves with yes-men. When you limit free speech of a country, you cut off most of your people from certain intelligence. You could argue the intelligence agency has access to everything, however, at some point, the original guys will retire. They will be replaced with people who grew up without consistent access to the entire world picture. They will thus be disadvantaged when engaging in international politics and trade deals. I guess it comes down to, do you think current and former leaders of the likes of China and North Korea are more or less happy or successful than current and former leaders of the likes of the US and France. > Speech should not be regulated in any ways You're not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater. Governments set limits to every right in order to balance public safety. If you think that's wrong, that's your choice. I'd just point out that you grew up in a society that benefited from this increased safety while sacrificing some portion of its people's rights. Unless you were raised in the jungle :-D.

TDL 11y ago
"You're not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater..." Yes, you are. Look at "Trope Two" in the link below. The post linked is written by Ken White who specializes in the 1st amendment. https://popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-censorship-tropes-in-the-medias-coverage-of-free-speech-controversies/ https://popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-cens...
- studentrob 11y ago
  Interesting, thanks for the correction. Maybe instead we can say, you're not allowed to threaten someone's life. The point is there are limits to free speech, even in America, though there are less limits there than in Europe where hate speech laws have been introduced.
  - TDL 11y ago
    Certainly, credible threats of violence are certainly a line.
gkya 11y ago
> You're not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater. Come on mate, I thought we're talking about political speech :) With regards to Erdogan as a businessman, the thing is, he is using his position to prosper as a rich man. I repeat, he has no care about what happens to the country. There are no ideologies, no nothing here. He uses the state as a means to cash in what he can. And he has his circle of assistants etc., what he wants is to be able to steer the politics and ultimately the state the way he wants w/o any friction.
- jessaustin 11y ago
  So he's basically a Ba'athist? That's parsimonious. I think this is the ground state for modern governments. To get anything more than Ba'athism takes a lot of work by a lot of people.
- studentrob 11y ago
  > he is using his position to prosper as a rich man I just said he would prosper more by accepting the diversity that exists in his region and the world. You're not even reading my comment, you're just repeating the same thing you said before.
nl 11y ago
It's probably worth noting that I don't think @gkya is supporting Erdogan. He is merely pointing out that his actions in attempting to censor foreign media have motives which aren't obvious. When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid.
- studentrob 11y ago
  > It's probably worth noting that I don't think @gkya is supporting Erdogan Thanks, I see that now. Some of @gkya's words sounded like they take the opposite viewpoint, such as, >> Speech should not be regulated in any ways >> Freedom of speech does not mean irresponsible and banale flow of whatever one thinks. >> freedom of speech must not mean that one can be reckless, inconsiderate and demeaning. It reads like it was unedited and is very hard to follow > When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid. I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money.
  - gkya 11y ago
    I'm sorry if I've been unclear. I do not in any ways support Erdogan. Though I insist that freedom of speech does not mean that one can be irresponsible of what he says.
    - studentrob 11y ago
      Everything you say and do has consequences whether you accept them or not. Free speech says the state cannot punish you for what you say, with certain small exceptions that vary by country that has free speech, such as libel and direct threats on someone's life.
  - nl 11y ago
    >> When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid. > I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money. Right, but that is assuming that Erdogan is trying to do what is best for the country in the long term. Many would argue his primary concern is Erdogan's interests in the short term.

TDL 11y ago

"You're not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater..." Yes, you are. Look at "Trope Two" in the link below. The post linked is written by Ken White who specializes in the 1st amendment. https://popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-censorship-tropes-in-the-medias-coverage-of-free-speech-controversies/ https://popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-cens...

studentrob 11y ago
Interesting, thanks for the correction. Maybe instead we can say, you're not allowed to threaten someone's life. The point is there are limits to free speech, even in America, though there are less limits there than in Europe where hate speech laws have been introduced.
- TDL 11y ago
  Certainly, credible threats of violence are certainly a line.

gkya 11y ago

> You're not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater. Come on mate, I thought we're talking about political speech :) With regards to Erdogan as a businessman, the thing is, he is using his position to prosper as a rich man. I repeat, he has no care about what happens to the country. There are no ideologies, no nothing here. He uses the state as a means to cash in what he can. And he has his circle of assistants etc., what he wants is to be able to steer the politics and ultimately the state the way he wants w/o any friction.

jessaustin 11y ago
So he's basically a Ba'athist? That's parsimonious. I think this is the ground state for modern governments. To get anything more than Ba'athism takes a lot of work by a lot of people.
studentrob 11y ago
> he is using his position to prosper as a rich man I just said he would prosper more by accepting the diversity that exists in his region and the world. You're not even reading my comment, you're just repeating the same thing you said before.

nl 11y ago

It's probably worth noting that I don't think @gkya is supporting Erdogan. He is merely pointing out that his actions in attempting to censor foreign media have motives which aren't obvious. When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid.

studentrob 11y ago
> It's probably worth noting that I don't think @gkya is supporting Erdogan Thanks, I see that now. Some of @gkya's words sounded like they take the opposite viewpoint, such as, >> Speech should not be regulated in any ways >> Freedom of speech does not mean irresponsible and banale flow of whatever one thinks. >> freedom of speech must not mean that one can be reckless, inconsiderate and demeaning. It reads like it was unedited and is very hard to follow > When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid. I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money.
- gkya 11y ago
  I'm sorry if I've been unclear. I do not in any ways support Erdogan. Though I insist that freedom of speech does not mean that one can be irresponsible of what he says.
  - studentrob 11y ago
    Everything you say and do has consequences whether you accept them or not. Free speech says the state cannot punish you for what you say, with certain small exceptions that vary by country that has free speech, such as libel and direct threats on someone's life.
- nl 11y ago
  >> When one looks at his actions in the light of those motives his actions make a lot of sense. Without those motives his actions appear stupid. > I disagree, see my comments about astute businessmen not using yes-men above. No worries if we don't agree here. Countries are most certainly businesses. They're in the business of acquiring people who generate money. Right, but that is assuming that Erdogan is trying to do what is best for the country in the long term. Many would argue his primary concern is Erdogan's interests in the short term.