3 ms·
>underpowered I still don't get this. Underpowered compared to what? The lastest CPU model? Well, that's to be expected every 6 mounths or so. But from a user'
by konart 11y ago
>underpowered
I still don't get this. Underpowered compared to what? The lastest CPU model? Well, that's to be expected every 6 mounths or so. But from a user's point of view? No so much to be honest.
I can see how latest CPU might give some advantages to those who are dependent on computations, but other than this... no. RAM is the the only thing I've updated in the last 2 year (need all these VMs, IDEs, browser etc). Never saw CPU usage going >80%
- brudgers 11y agoIn terms of raw computational power, e.g. MFLOPS, there is a plausible case regarding GPU's. The article mentions this in passing as more of a "shiny new" gripe than a "GPU's are the future of computing". Since more people are more motivated by "shiny new" than are limited by the GPU throughput, I'm not surprised at the author's approach or convinced that from a business standpoint GPU performance is critical for Mac marketing. My only point is that there tends to be a technical difference in regard to GPU computational power at similar price points. I'm not saying that this is necessarily important.
- joshuata 11y agoI agree. I use a 13" 2013 rmBP with the base processor and 8 gb of RAM. There have been several times where I was running 2 external monitors (1080p), watching HD video, running 2-4 virtualbox vms, running a big compile job, and surfing the web with 10+ tabs open. Even under that load the computer felt responsive, and that is all I really care about.