I'm not sold on the AGW stuff the environmentalists put out, but their problem is positioning and they haven't grasped that in their battle. Nobody is arguing

I'm not sold on the AGW stuff the environmentalists put out, but their problem is positioning and they haven't grasped that in their battle. Nobody is arguing climate change can have big impact. We're discussing AGW. Obviously deforestation and air pollution is a Bad Thing. The environmentalists would be better off telling that story which is quite simple and easy to understand. I'm a buyer of that as both logic and an investment but not the Chicken-Little AGW story. Positioning is very important when you are selling something. ~7 million die from air pollution related deaths per year Total number of people that die of starvation per year: ~8 million. ~900 million malnourished. ~800 million don't have access to clean water. Several millions die each year from diseases related to unsanitary water. I don't understand why we can't unite and tackle those 3 instead of making it a battle between politics, environmentalism and self-righteousness (both sides). If you believe or don't believe in AGW - tackling air pollution, food supply and the water crisis should be of utmost importance.