4 ms·
This is a blatant violation of https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 which prohibit direct interceptio
by _l3es 11y ago
This is a blatant violation of https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 which prohibit direct interception of communications, 4th amendment/UN rights to privacy and encryption http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/CallForSubmission.aspx http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/CallForS... extending to personal devices, and circumventing 5th amendment rights of compelled decryption.
- einarvollset 11y agoUnlikely, because they have a valid search warrant.
- DannyBee 11y agoErrr, it's pretty much none of those things :) (ie they have a valid search warrant, the fifth amendment does not protect you here under any current caselaw, etc)
- profmonocle 11y ago> the fifth amendment does not protect you here under any current caselaw I can't see even a speculative 5th amendment argument. If they can crack your phone without your cooperation, how could they possibly be forcing you to incriminate yourself?
- _l3es 11y agoEdit, guess I didn't do my research on the scope of what a warrant allows to be done.