4 ms·
You are correct that they did not explicitly say this, however I do believe they - through Director James Comey's statements, strongly implied this: The San Be
by matheweis 11y ago
You are correct that they did not explicitly say this, however I do believe they - through Director James Comey's statements, strongly implied this:
The San Bernardino litigation isn't about trying to set a precedent or send any kind of message... We simply want the chance, with a search warrant, to try to guess the terrorist's passcode without the phone essentially self-destructing and without it taking a decade to guess correctly. That's it. We don't want to break anyone's encryption or set a master key loose on the land.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/we-could-not-look-survivors-eye-if-we-did-not-follow-lead https://www.lawfareblog.com/we-could-not-look-survivors-eye-...
- teacup50 11y agoThe precedent of "search warrants" already existed. They weren't creating it.