3 ms·
Someone's going to try to sell me something I'm susceptible to buying? So what. Authorities don't collect data on you to protect you, they are ostensibly doing
by rz2k 11y ago
Someone's going to try to sell me something I'm susceptible to buying? So what.
Authorities don't collect data on you to protect you, they are ostensibly doing it to protect other citizens from you.
One of the reasons that "smart" people object to this, is that it could also limit their ability to play a leadership role in civic life, if there are people in positions of authority with different political philosophies or, even worse, who are outright corrupt or dishonest.
Besides the obvious examples of abuse like the Nixon administration, I suspect there are very few counties in the country that don't have at least one case of someone in a sheriff department, school board, city council, etc that has been caught using their rather limited access to information about local citizens for the purpose of staying in power or for some form of personal gain.
- surferbayarea 11y agoThis data should ideally be protected and owned by the individuals themselves - not the government, not the ad companies, not Google, not Facebook. As an individual who owns my data, I should have a right to decide who/when/how accesses my data. More than a question of privacy, this is a question of next-generation user experience. If as an individual, my data from uber, google, facebook, visa, amazon is all in one place I can give selective anonymized access to it to different services that can leverage the collective data to provide better user experiences to me.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]