Agreed. We were using Asana for project management for a long time, but weren't happy. It's too cluttered and dense, with too many possibilities for accidental

Agreed. We were using Asana for project management for a long time, but weren't happy. It's too cluttered and dense, with too many possibilities for accidental edits (you nearly always have a cursor in some field) and very little sense of modality. You feel like you're in a spreadsheet. Which is not a good model for a project management system. Personally I was also extremely unhappy with the WYSIWYG contenteditable editor they used for rich text fields; very error-prone (undo didn't really work properly) and almost useless for exchanging code snippets. We ended up switching to Clubhouse [1] (a Pivotal/Trello clone with a Slack aesthetic), and our project manager is now much happier with the pipeline-oriented task view, which is something that was missing from Asana. Text fields are Markdown, which is a huge improvement. There's nothing revolutionary about Clubhouse, it's just plain and nice. Asana wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good. A bit surprised that YC is bothering with them. [1] https://clubhouse.io/ https://clubhouse.io/