4 ms·
Every model that does not have a proper arrow of time, and therefor prevents time-travel backwards, is fundamentally broken. It either breaks causality or energ
by poelzi 11y ago
Every model that does not have a proper arrow of time, and therefor prevents time-travel backwards, is fundamentally broken. It either breaks causality or energy conservation and therefor simply does not relate to our reality.
I'm so happy that the model I adopted disallows time travel (this does not mean that your time can't be slowed down, but you simply can't travel backwards).
- nuncanada 11y agoAgreed. But such a reasonable assumption would inviabilize philosophers writing so many papers and books... What model did you adopt?
- poelzi 11y agoBasic Structures of Matter - Supergravitation Unified Theory by Dr. Stoyan Sarg. http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitation-Unified/dp/1412083877 http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitati... Uses the most minimal basic assumptions and fits experimental data very well. Of course, the book analyzes many parts simplified, therefor small differences to the observed values. We have a long term plan to implement a numeric simulator to get better values and check the model in more details. Also, there are some questions that can't be answered otherwise - but those are corner cases in the universe (merger of anti-matter galaxy with matter one - the result is different in this model)