4 ms·
I'm doing work in venture capital with a specific focus on computer vision. I've looked into the agricultural robotics topic with some scrutiny. Here are some c
by johnloeber 11y ago
I'm doing work in venture capital with a specific focus on computer vision. I've looked into the agricultural robotics topic with some scrutiny. Here are some comments:
* feasibility of this new technology is due to the commoditization of three necessary components over the last few years: cameras (improved immensely in both quality and cost due to the smartphone revolution), drones/UAVs/small satellites themselves, and services like AWS that allow small enterprises to crunch huge amounts of geospatial data at little cost.
* there's good reason to believe that the commoditization of those components (i.e. availability and quality) will increase in the next few years.
* drones of the popular quadcopter type are a mixed bag -- their range is very limited because the batteries required to operate them are very heavy. This is tough because they have to survey huge areas. For large areas, many drones are required, which poses a significant overhead cost. However, what's nice about them is that they can be used with surgical precision: if something looks weird, drones can fly very close to the ground and take high-res pictures.
* conversely, what's nice about UAVs and small sats is that they can capture geospatial data on huge areas much more easily (though in lower resolution).
I think we're generally going to see a kind of two-tier approach, in which a high-altitude machine (a UAV mini-plane, or even higher up, a small satellite) does the broad aerial surveillance, and a low-altitude machine, i.e. a quadcopter drone, is sent out for random sampling to cross-reference the geospatial data, and for surgical investigation of abnormalities. The economic benefits of such a scheme could be quite significant for farmers.
I'm also looking forward to drones with more sophisticated sensors -- for example, heat or IR cameras. These are pretty rare on the market so far. Regrettably, they aren't being commoditized in the way that regular cameras are, so progress on this front may be a little slower.
- fanquake 11y ago"can capture geospatial data on huge areas much more easily" What are you referring to as a "huge" area? All the work I'm seeing done with drones has been limited to ~700ha/day, if you've got perfect conditions. Normally it's much less. What do you think drones with heat or IR cameras are most applicable too? When we've got machinery mounted sensors such as a biomass/NDVI camera or a weed-seeker, and the machinery has to make a pass over the field anyways, why not have those sensors onboard the machine? We're seeing Weed-seekers pay for themselves in the first year of use.
- infinite8s 11y agoThat comment was referring to the use of UAVs or small satellites for broad surveillance (but at a lower resolution).
- hengheng 11y ago* AWS is way too expensive, and in most places where aerial mapping happens, you can't upload 30 Gigabyte to the internet faster than you can process it locally on a gaming PC. * Smartphone cameras are almost sufficient, but mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras save the day. Completely agree on the rest btw.
- CurtMonash 11y agoDrones have a "significant overhead cost". Who knew? :)
- SixSigma 11y agoWould an Autonomous Guided Vehicle be a better idea? Flying strikes me as the expensive part, not moving.
- TheArcane 11y agoAre you looking to hire?
- jbms 11y agoIR camera modules that can be plugged into smartphones have been dropping in cost fast and the quality's superb for uncooled IR sensors, so they're not far off being usable.