I disagree. First of all, I never said that anything was pointless. Secondly, Mark criticized my arguments because I had merely "scuffed on the subject of the I

I disagree. First of all, I never said that anything was pointless. Secondly, Mark criticized my arguments because I had merely "scuffed on the subject of the IRS" in his words. I think I'm entitled to know what he's written on the subject. Especially when I've offered up my name and background, asking for an anonymous critic's name and background does not constitute an ad hominem attack, and may in fact raise important points in the context of a debate.