The principle sounds appealing, but 1. This speaker denies fitting that description, and of those that read his work, some agree that he isn't, while some disa

The principle sounds appealing, but 1. This speaker denies fitting that description, and of those that read his work, some agree that he isn't, while some disagree, and some aren't sure. Perhaps not surprising, since he wrote a lot, and it's fairly complex. This is therefore not a clear-cut case. 2. Worse, what racial supremacy means depends on who is talking. For example, Black Lives Matters protestors have claimed that a public library, which by federal law cannot exclude people based on race, is white supremacist for that very reason: http://www.infowars.com/black-lives-matter-accuses-public-library-of-white-supremacy/ http://www.infowars.com/black-lives-matter-accuses-public-li... There is no simple way or simple solution here. These are hard questions, with no clear answers.