4 ms·
I considered that but I'm worried that won't work with WebAssembly because it's a more memory-constrained environment. Your app may generate a ton of data in a
by constexpr 11y ago
I considered that but I'm worried that won't work with WebAssembly because it's a more memory-constrained environment. Your app may generate a ton of data in a frame and run off the end of the address space. I guess I'm probably just thinking back to asm.js where you sometimes only have 256mb to work with. I'll try this first at least since it makes stuff easier.
- manyoso 11y agoJust go with pure reference counting. It'll be faster and easier.