I think you almost hit the nail on the head, but I believe it is more specific to say that we're more towards the "simple components" end at least for this one

I think you almost hit the nail on the head, but I believe it is more specific to say that we're more towards the "simple components" end at least for this one problem space ... For instance, a combo of DNN for a generally visual overview strategy, and then tree search, at least for the 2D game of Go.... which is flipping astounding, sure, but I keep seeing daily where people are continuing to play with DNN with varying levels of success, and it is by no means general intelligence. So, we do have this nice tool that sort of lets us "look" in "general" way, but it is not entirely understandable, or traceable, which is the nature of NN... It would be nice to be able to prove exactly why something happened, and to be able to have reproducible, exact training. Anyway... I guess I don't have much of a point beyond these two vague minor thoughts, but I did want to add them in here...