Perhaps your judgement with age is the thing which has changed, you haven't even proposed why the latter argument is invalid? How can you argue that Outlook wi

Perhaps your judgement with age is the thing which has changed, you haven't even proposed why the latter argument is invalid? How can you argue that Outlook without Xobni is better than Outlook with Xobni. Outlook is so bad that any minor improvement which changes the user experience of a product which hasn't changed in 10 years is a positive one. Obviously we aren't talking about the magnitude of the positive change which will increase as xobni improves its product. Surely its existence is sufficient to warrant the acceptance that its a step in the right direction. I would conjecture you don't even use xobni, or for that matter outlook ;)