3 ms·
Obviously, you would have to avoid the "Company Store" problem. I think it could be a terrible PR move. If you effectively pay your employees less and justify
by tanker 11y ago
Obviously, you would have to avoid the "Company Store" problem.
I think it could be a terrible PR move. If you effectively pay your employees less and justify by giving them discounts. A program that begins with good intentions could end badly. Especially if the program is conceived in an era of high profits. In low profits, management makes different decisions. Also, you often get new management.
- SpaceCadetJones 11y agoI'm a bit confused, where does the effectively paying less come from? I suggested they increase their pay while also giving them a discount at the store to give them an incentive to spend their new income at the store.
- tanker 11y agoI communicated poorly. Paying your employees more and giving them a discount is harmless. Lots of employees receive a discount. I meant you run into problems when you end up effectively paying them less and justifying via a larger discount. Management could end up doing this gradually as times get tough. For example, a company announces lay offs and pay cuts, but softens the blow with a larger discount. I guess I'm recommending caution. I would avoid making a discount a major part of employee compensation. A worker deciding to apply for jobs at Walmart and Costco could end up weighing a better health plan against a higher discount on basic goods. That seems problematic to me.
- SpaceCadetJones 11y agoThanks for clarifying, this makes a lot of sense.