4 ms·
I'm struggling to find the right way to disagree with this. On one hand, we do know the downsides, provided there is no immunization. We don't develop the anti
by Delmania 11y ago
I'm struggling to find the right way to disagree with this. On one hand, we do know the downsides, provided there is no immunization. We don't develop the antibodies needed to fight the disease, and we're at greater risk for an outbreak. Polio was defeated largely due to immunizations, but there's still outbreaks that are devastating because people don't get vaccinated.
I'm also not sure we can vaccinate against the cold, I think it's like the flu, it mutates too quickly.
- FussyZeus 11y agoWell right I'm not disagreeing directly, I'm more saying if we could choose to simply not get colds, we don't know definitively what that would mean because it's impossible to test currently in any sort of practical way.