4 ms·
I'm not convinced by either side. The "scientific explanation why it is impossible" stresses the 230 liter/min that must pass through the device. While this num
by jlg23 11y ago
I'm not convinced by either side. The "scientific explanation why it is impossible" stresses the 230 liter/min that must pass through the device. While this number sounds large, one cubic meter holds 1000 liter.
But yes, an independent test would be great.
- sschueller 11y agoThis is 100 l/min : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gauj_2nbjkU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gauj_2nbjkU
- jlg23 11y agoUhm.. yes... thanks. I have a pretty solid understanding of volumes. And a youtube-video of "100 l/min" does not qualify as scientific argument for me. The relevant questions for me are: a) What's the actual active surface of the gills? b) Is the device actively sucking in water or does it rely on immersion alone? It is pretty easy to fork through thousands of liters per minute (ever cleaned a pool?). Yes, I am still very skeptical, but I do give people who put their name behind something at least the benefit of the doubt.