5 ms·
I wasn't sure which numbering scheme to use. I figure some people are going to read the PDF in their browser or some reader without external page numbers. If y
by AngryParsley 17y ago
I wasn't sure which numbering scheme to use. I figure some people are going to read the PDF in their browser or some reader without external page numbers.
If you don't own any books that would make police suspicious, you're probably either boring or super paranoid. Looking through my library ( http://www.librarything.com/catalog/AngryParsley http://www.librarything.com/catalog/AngryParsley ), I've got a couple: Applied Cryptography, Machiavelli's Prince, and a book with a favorable opinion of US gun culture.
- bmm6o 17y agoIt's not that the book itself made him appear suspicious, it's that there are shared elements between the book and the letters. Further, it wasn't just that he owned a copy of the book, he threw it away in a manner that indicates a consciousness of guilt. [not that I necessarily agree with the above - it's just my interpretation of the passage]
- jerf 17y agoYeah, I read that passage with my Suspicious Hat on (nobody gets geek culture! nobody!), but if all the facts they lay out are factual, I can't object to the chain of inference there; it is at least plausible.
- xsmasher 17y agoI was expecting a very thin connection - "Oh, GEB has sections on DNA, the letters in this messgae could be DNA codons" - but seeing the "bolded letter" code from the letters explained in GEB is more than just a tentative connection.