The absence of these items from the Constitution does not imply their opinions on the matter. The Constitution sets out a system of government, not a definition

The absence of these items from the Constitution does not imply their opinions on the matter. The Constitution sets out a system of government, not a definition of how the economy should be run. As to what you assert their opinions would be, you'd have to look at their own writings and find something to the effect; noting what many of the constructs you described wern't even being considered during that time. But that evidence won't be in the Constitution. The Constitution lays out who's responsible for what, and who can make what decisions. It is not a bible stating the mores of the nation.