3 ms·
It sounds like they are trying to do exactly what you suggest: We’ll ask you to solve some coding questions in a language and text editor of your choice. Feel
by yummyfajitas 11y ago
It sounds like they are trying to do exactly what you suggest:
We’ll ask you to solve some coding questions in a language and text editor of your choice. Feel free to bring your own laptop, or we’ll be happy to provide one. Notably, we ask candidates not to compile or run their code during this exercise, and not to refer to online resources. Our goal is not to simulate day-to-day software development — where we read docs and write lots of tests! — but rather to see how you reason about your code and input cases. For that same reason, we won’t ding you for superficial syntax errors or misremembered function names. After leaving you to work through the questions on your own, we’ll sit down together and talk through your solutions (including any ideas you didn’t have time to commit to code).
In any case, all I'm disputing is the idea that formal reasoning about algorithms (without stressing function names and compilation) is a useless skill. We have tools that make it unnecessary for many entry level devs, but that doesn't mean everyone can ignore it.
- tptacek 11y agoAbsolutely nobody has suggested that formal reasoning about algorithms is a useless skill.
- yummyfajitas 11y agoEveryone has heard of interviews that pointlessly refuse candidates the opportunity to consult Internet references, like every working programmer does every time they code anything ever. But your process goes a step further: you won't even allow candidates to compile their code. How can this possibly be helpful to your process? To me it sounds exactly like they want you to demonstrate some semi-formal reasoning about algorithms, and you think this is not a realistic representation of work. What do you think they mean, and what do you oppose?